Current:Home > MarketsNYC will pay $17.5M to settle lawsuit alleging women were forced to remove hijabs in mugshots -WealthMap Solutions
NYC will pay $17.5M to settle lawsuit alleging women were forced to remove hijabs in mugshots
View
Date:2025-04-16 00:27:53
NEW YORK – The city agreed Friday to pay $17.5 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that alleged police officers forced two women to remove hijabs while mugshot photos were being taken, lawyers for the women said Friday.
The case, filed in 2018, stemmed from the arrests of Muslim American women Jamilla Clark and Arwa Aziz. In court records, they alleged New York City Police officers threatened them to remove their headscarves, and the two felt ashamed after being forced to do so.
New York City:NYPD officer shot, killed during traffic stop in Queens by suspect with prior arrests
“When they forced me to take off my hijab, I felt as if I were naked,” Clark said in a statement released by her lawyers and advocates. “I’m not sure if words can capture how exposed and violated I felt.”
The settlement announced Friday still requires approval by U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres in federal court in New York.
Clark and Aziz’s attorney, O. Andrew F. Wilson, said forcing someone to remove religious clothing is akin to a strip search. The women alleged the removal of their hijabs for booking photographs violated their First Amendment rights, as well as federal religious protections and state law.
“This is a milestone for New Yorkers’ privacy and religious rights,”said Albert Fox Cahn, executive director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, a civil rights group that provided legal representation for the plaintiffs. “The NYPD should never have stripped these religious New Yorkers of their head coverings and dignity. This wasn’t just an assault on their rights, but on everything our city claims to believe in."
In 2020, the New York City Police Department changed its policy as a response to the lawsuit, allowing people to be photographed with religious garb as long as their faces weren’t covered, the New York Times reported. Advocates supporting the lawsuit said the NYPD has practiced a policy of keeping mugshots as part of its facial recognition surveillance program.
The agreement maintains the city denied engaging in a pattern or process that deprived people of their protected rights, court records said. The city didn’t admit to the specific claims made by Clark and Aziz.
Nick Paolucci, a spokesperson for the New York City Law Department, said the resolution was in the best interest of all parties.
“This settlement resulted in a positive reform for the NYPD,” he said in a statement. “The agreement carefully balances the department’s respect for firmly held religious beliefs with the important law enforcement need to take arrest photos.”
Criminal justice:New York City police have to track the race of people they stop. Will others follow suit?
Clark and Aziz both wore hijabs in line with their Muslim faith, which covers a woman’s hair, ears and neck, but leaves her face exposed. Many observant Muslim women wear it at all times when they’re in the presence of men who aren’t part of their immediate family.
In January 2017, Clark said she wept with her hijab down around her shoulders at NYPD headquarters in Manhattan, and begged to put it back on, court records said. She said she had been arrested for violating an order of protection by her ex-husband, which she said was false.
Eight months later, in August, Aziz had her photo taken with her hijab at her neck, in a Brooklyn precinct after voluntarily turning herself over to NYPD for violating a protective order against her sister-in-law that she said she didn’t commit. She, too, cried during the photos that had to be taken in front of several male NYPD officers and over 30 men incarcerated, according to court records.
As part of the agreement, the city prepared a class list of people who had their religious head covering removed for an official NYPD photo, according to court records. Attorneys estimate the proposed settlement could make over 3,600 people eligible for payments between approximately $7,000 and $13,000. They encouraged anyone who had their head coverings removed for a mugshot between March 16, 2014 and Aug. 23, 2021 to also file.
“We send our appreciation to the Muslim women who bravely persisted with this litigation, prompting policy change that benefit many with similar religious garb requirements,” Afar Nasher, executive director of the civil rights group Council on American-Islamic Relations New York chapter, said in a statement.
Notices of the settlement would go out to people identified in police records. Information would be available in English and also in Arabic, Bengali, Spanish, Urdu and Hebrew.
veryGood! (5417)
Related
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Women suing over Idaho’s abortion ban describe dangerous pregnancies, becoming ‘medical refugees’
- 2 credit unions in Mississippi and Louisiana are planning to merge
- PSA: Coach Outlet Has Stocking Stuffers, Gifts Under $100 & More for the Holidays RN (up to 60% Off)
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul VIP fight package costs a whopping $2M. Here's who bought it.
- Patrick Mahomes Breaks Silence on Frustrating Robbery Amid Ongoing Investigation
- Get $103 Worth of Tatcha Skincare for $43.98 + 70% Off Flash Deals on Elemis, Josie Maran & More
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Amazon Best Books of 2024 revealed: Top 10 span genres but all 'make you feel deeply'
Ranking
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Amazon Best Books of 2024 revealed: Top 10 span genres but all 'make you feel deeply'
- California man allegedly shot couple and set their bodies, Teslas on fire in desert
- Jason Kelce Jokes He Got “Mixed Reviews” From Kylie Kelce Over NSFW Commentary
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Gisele Bündchen Makes First Major Appearance Since Pregnancy
- Who is Rep. Matt Gaetz, the Florida congressman Donald Trump picked to serve as attorney general?
- American arrested in death of another American at luxury hotel in Ireland
Recommendation
Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
Watch a rescuer’s cat-like reflexes pluck a kitten from mid-air after a scary fall
Missouri prosecutor says he won’t charge Nelly after an August drug arrest
Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas says he was detained in airport over being ‘disoriented’
Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
DWTS’ Ilona Maher and Alan Bersten Have the Best Reaction to Fans Hoping for a Romance
Justine Bateman feels like she can breathe again in 'new era' after Trump win
Federal judge orders Oakland airport to stop using ‘San Francisco’ in name amid lawsuit